{"id":45983,"date":"2022-02-28T14:25:44","date_gmt":"2022-02-28T14:25:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatechangenews.com\/?p=45983"},"modified":"2022-02-28T18:17:02","modified_gmt":"2022-02-28T18:17:02","slug":"revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/","title":{"rendered":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Negotiations over how to summarise the science of climate impacts for the latest UN bombshell report <\/strong>were dogged by tense disagreements between rich polluters and at-risk nations, Climate Home News can reveal.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the most contentious topics as online talks at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ran into overtime on Saturday.<\/p>\n

Sources monitoring the two-week discussions, which are closed to media, said that a group of developed nations including the US, Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands and Norway pushed for key phrases and figures to be removed from the summary for policymakers (SPM).<\/span><\/p>\n

These include the US seeking to replace the mention of adaptation finance with \u201cinvestment\u201d and pushing for greater emphasis on the role of the private funds. The government representative objected to putting a percentage range on the amount of global tracked climate finance that had gone to adaptation. <\/span>Scientists had expressed “high confidence” in the proposed 4-8% range, which came from analysis by the Climate Policy Initiative.<\/p>\n

IPCC: <\/strong>Five takeaways from the UN\u2019s 2022 climate impacts report<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Developing countries, led by India, reportedly stood their ground and the term \u201cfinance for adaptation\u201d appears in the final SPM, albeit without concrete figures.<\/span><\/p>\n

The US also led efforts to replace the term<\/a> \u201closses and damages\u201d with \u201cadverse impacts\u201d – but ultimately only succeeded in adding words. A draft SPM obtained by Climate Home two weeks ago said climate change had caused \u201cwidespread losses and damages to nature and people\u201d. Monday\u2019s final version instead references \u201cwidespread adverse impacts and related losses and damages\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

“The Biden administration is not only shutting their eyes to the reality of the climate crisis – they\u2019re trying to blindfold the rest of the world too,” said Teresa Anderson, climate policy coordinator at ActionAid International.<\/p>\n

“They appear to wear a badge of climate leadership, while doing all they can to block those most in need from getting help. It\u2019s dishonest and utterly shameful.”<\/p>\n

IPCC: <\/strong>UN report shows us human costs of climate failure<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Observers said that developed nations lobbied hard for references to the benefits of \u201cnature-based solutions\u201d (NbS) – projects such as conservation and tree-planting – to be included in the summary. This prompted pushback from several countries, led by South Africa.<\/span><\/p>\n

The term is seen by some as deflecting responsibility away from burners of fossil fuels. It appeared in a main paragraph of the draft SPM, but in the final version it has been relegated to a footnote, stating: \u201cThe term is the subject of ongoing debate, with concerns that it may lead to the misunderstanding that NbS on its own can provide a global solution to climate change.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The concept of \u201covershoot\u201d – temporarily exceeding temperature caps before cooling off later this century – also provoked intense debate. An attempt by vulnerable nations to include reference to the Paris Agreement temperature goal of 1.5C in the heading of the overshoot section failed.<\/span><\/p>\n

And, at China\u2019s insistence, a footnote appears in the final SPM qualifying that there is limited evidence on the impacts of temporary 1.5C overshoot.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

According to sources monitoring the talks, the US stood alone in seeking to keep a draft paragraph referencing solar radiation modification (SRM), carbon dioxide removals (CDR) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a single block.<\/span><\/p>\n

Other countries pushed to separate SRM,\u00a0<\/span>which could cool the planet but does not address the underlying cause of heating – that is, levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2018Nature-based solutions<\/strong>\u2019 prove divisive at Glasgow climate talks<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Sources said the US \u201caggressively fought\u201d for a \u201cbalanced\u201d statement that took five hours of side huddles at the virtual talks to resolve. When it became clear that SRM would be separated from emission reduction and carbon sequestration options, the US sought to drop the mention of SRM altogether due to the focus on its risks.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The final SPM states that SRM would \u201cintroduce a widespread range of new risks to people and ecosystems, which are not well understood\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

Several developing countries rejected draft phrasing which portrayed migration as an option for adapting to climate impacts, and the link was dropped in the final summary. They also pushed successfully for a mention of \u201cpast emissions\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

While they wanted language acknowledging specifically that past emissions had constrained their development options, the final phrasing is more nuanced: \u201cPast and current development trends (past emissions, development and climate change) have not advanced global climate resilient development.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This article was amended after publication to clarify that the 4-8% adaptation finance share was of global tracked climate finance from public and private sources, not exclusively flows to developing countries.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":45984,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,3858,4234],"tags":[],"coauthors":[4814],"class_list":["post-45983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-adaptation","category-policy","category-ipcc","type-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nRevealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Home News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Patrick Galey\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ClimateHome\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ClimateHome\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Patrick Galey\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Patrick Galey\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7e285ad4eed19dfec016f9407a969db0\"},\"headline\":\"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\"},\"wordCount\":786,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Adaptation\",\"Climate politics\",\"IPCC\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\",\"name\":\"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00\",\"description\":\"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":450,\"caption\":\"Residents swim through flooded homes after typhoon Ulysses in the Philippines (Photo: Greenpeace\/Jilson Tiu)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Home News\",\"description\":\"Climate change news, analysis, commentary, video and podcasts focused on developments in global climate politics\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Climate Home News\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png\",\"width\":2856,\"height\":862,\"caption\":\"Climate Home News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ClimateHome\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/climate-home-news\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/climatestudio\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7e285ad4eed19dfec016f9407a969db0\",\"name\":\"Patrick Galey\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/author\/patrick-galey\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts","description":"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts","og_description":"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime","og_url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/","og_site_name":"Climate Home News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":450,"url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Patrick Galey","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ClimateHome","twitter_site":"@ClimateHome","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Patrick Galey","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/"},"author":{"name":"Patrick Galey","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7e285ad4eed19dfec016f9407a969db0"},"headline":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts","datePublished":"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/"},"wordCount":786,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg","articleSection":["Adaptation","Climate politics","IPCC"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/","name":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg","datePublished":"2022-02-28T14:25:44+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-28T18:17:02+00:00","description":"Adaptation finance, nature-based solutions and solar geoengineering were among the contentious topics that sent IPCC talks into overtime","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2022\/02\/28115042\/GP1SULNT_Web_size-e1646053355377.jpg","width":800,"height":450,"caption":"Residents swim through flooded homes after typhoon Ulysses in the Philippines (Photo: Greenpeace\/Jilson Tiu)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2022\/02\/28\/revealed-how-rich-and-at-risk-nations-fought-over-science-of-climate-impacts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Revealed: How rich and at-risk nations fought over science of climate impacts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/","name":"Climate Home News","description":"Climate change news, analysis, commentary, video and podcasts focused on developments in global climate politics","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization","name":"Climate Home News","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png","width":2856,"height":862,"caption":"Climate Home News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ClimateHome","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/climate-home-news","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/climatestudio"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7e285ad4eed19dfec016f9407a969db0","name":"Patrick Galey","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/author\/patrick-galey\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45983"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45983"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45985,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45983\/revisions\/45985"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45983"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=45983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}