{"id":37799,"date":"2018-10-12T11:50:10","date_gmt":"2018-10-12T10:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/?p=37799"},"modified":"2018-10-12T11:50:10","modified_gmt":"2018-10-12T10:50:10","slug":"brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/","title":{"rendered":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout"},"content":{"rendered":"

Britain\u2019s decision to pull out of the EU\u2019s atomic energy community at the same time as Brexit sparked warnings that the country would face shortages of electricity and cancer treatments.<\/strong><\/p>\n

These concerns posed by its planned departure from the 61-year-old Euratom\u00a0treaty have spurred London to act more decisively than in many other areas of Brexit prep work over the past two years.<\/p>\n

In a progress report<\/a> sent to the parliament earlier this week, the government said it had new inspection staff in training and key cooperation agreements either in place or in the making.<\/p>\n

It also\u00a0promised fill in for\u00a0lost Euratom funding of\u00a0research and development, so as to carry on a government goal to become a “world-leader” in nuclear energy innovation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But if the UK and EU fail to clinch a\u00a0deal on their future relationship before March 29, the timeline to finish these preparations will evaporate. The country will break away that day, without a Brexit transition period up through 2020.<\/p>\n

Talks will move into their final stages when EU leaders meet in Brussels next week, amid continuing disagreement.<\/p>\n

EU<\/strong> lawmakers support 55% emission cuts as IPCC spectre lurks<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cIf there isn\u2019t a deal, the presumption is that all of that falls through,\u201d said Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the UK\u2019s Nuclear Industry Association.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe longer the situation goes on, the more risk there is that there would be a shortage [of power],\u201d he added. \u201cThe more risk there is that there may be planned maintenance that means a power station is not operating and there could be delays in moving components backwards and forwards.\u201d<\/p>\n

Euratom is governed by a standalone treaty\u00a0that predates the European Union, but covers\u00a0all\u00a028 of its member countries.<\/p>\n

It manages nuclear fuel supply throughout the bloc, inspects civil nuclear sites to make sure they\u2019re not being used for weapons, and holds cooperation agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency and other countries active in the industry. It also allows for free movement of nuclear workers and equipment between members, facilitates the construction of new projects and funds research and development, including the EU’s portion of an international nuclear fusion pilot project in France.<\/p>\n

What happens in the next few months will impact the future of the Paris Agreement and the global climate
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

CHN will be there keeping you informed from the inside.<\/p>\n

If you value our coverage, please consider helping us. Become a CHN patron for\u00a0as little as $5 per month.<\/p>\n

We have set up\u00a0a Patreon account<\/span><\/a><\/strong>. It\u2019s a simple, safe and easy way for you to become part of a community that will secure and guide our future.<\/p>\n

Thank you!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A no-deal<\/a> \u2018Brexatom\u2019 on March 29, without replacements set for Euratom’s role, could lead to significant problems in the UK’s energy market, both in the nearer and longer terms.<\/p>\n

Nuclear energy generates around a quarter of Britain\u2019s electricity from seven power stations. It’s one of the few European countries intent on building a fleet of new, expensive but emissions-free nuclear stations, starting with the Hinkley Point C plant already under construction by French energy utility EDF.<\/p>\n

The longer the gap between Euratom and a new domestic regime, the more likely plants would be to run out of fuel (when that happens depends on how much fuel the operators can stockpile before Brexit day).\u00a0Even with fuel, however, Britain\u2019s generators would have to stop if they can’t meet international non-proliferation standards. That requires a new domestic\u00a0system to\u00a0inspect all UK sites, with approval from the International Atomic Energy Agency.<\/p>\n

Imported supplies of medical radioisotopes, used for cancer treatments and diagnoses,\u00a0could also be interrupted immediately after Brexit. Radioisotopes only last a few hours, and the UK cannot produce them at home.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kosovo:<\/strong> World Bank dumps plant, ending support for coal worldwide <\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the longer term, the UK could struggle to attract the workers or import the reactor components needed for Hinkley and other new nuclear plants, as well as maintenance work on existing reactors.<\/p>\n

With all these potential risks, the UK\u00a0government\u2019s\u00a0rush to\u00a0create a seamless transition out of Euratom, and its early agreement with the EU on issues such as the ownership of fissile materials\u00a0that Euratom now holds in the UK, are all reassuring.<\/p>\n

As part of its preparation, the government was quick to pass a nuclear safeguards bill this year that gives the Office of Nuclear Regulation\u00a0the power to inspect\u00a0civil nuclear sites for compliance with non-proliferation rules.<\/p>\n

The nuclear regulator,\u00a0which was traditionally responsible for safety, \u201cremains confident\u201d that it will have\u00a0the new safeguards regime in place by March 29, the government told the parliament this week. It\u2019s expected to need at least nine safeguards inspectors by then, and has so far hired and started training 14 of them, it said.<\/p>\n

The progress report doesn’t solve the sticky problem of medical isotopes, which could be left useless if they are stuck in border queues. The government said it was still considering options to avoid a shortage.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the government is firming up bilateral deals with key international nuclear players. It signed an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency in June, and is close to finalising cooperation deals with key nuclear countries – the US, Australia, Canada and Japan – before March 29, it said.<\/p>\n

Climate news in your inbox?<\/strong> Sign up here<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Deals agreed with Australia in August<\/a> and the US in May<\/a> are making their ways through those parliaments for ratification, and are expected to be presented to the UK parliament this autumn.\u00a0The government also expects to sign a deal with Canada later this year\u00a0and is in talks with Japan on\u00a0additions to an existing nuclear cooperation deal between the two, it said.<\/p>\n

But the UK is also keen to keep close ties with Euratom – something the nuclear industry is intent on seeing.<\/p>\n

The government told the parliament it wants to negotiate a \u201cmutually beneficial\u201d civil nuclear relationship\u00a0with Euratom. \u201cThis would be more comprehensive and broad than any existing agreement between Euratom and a third country, and would help ensure the UK\u2019s standing as a leading and responsible civil nuclear state is maintained,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

The relationship should give the country an association with European research and training programmes and funding, protect existing nuclear material supply contracts after Brexit, simplify export controls for sensitive nuclear materials, equipment and technology between\u00a0the two, and allow the UK to continue cooperating in the supply of medical radioisotopes,\u00a0among other benefits.<\/p>\n

The UK, for one, certainly has something to gain from these post-Brexit ties, the government said. “These objectives form part of government\u2019s wider ambition to develop an economic relationship with the EU that maximises future prosperity in line with the industrial strategy, and a new trading relationship that includes a free trade area for goods.”<\/p>\n

Republish this article<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"UK government report card on replacing the EU’s atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":37803,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4235,6,82,61],"tags":[],"coauthors":[4243],"class_list":["post-37799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brexit","category-energy","category-eu","category-nuclear","type-analysis"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nBrexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Climate Home News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"846\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"451\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sara Stefanini\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@sarastefaninii\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ClimateHome\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sara Stefanini\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sara Stefanini\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/47edcea2d5aa3742b830178f67913940\"},\"headline\":\"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\"},\"wordCount\":1157,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Brexit\",\"Energy\",\"EU\",\"Nuclear\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\",\"name\":\"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg\",\"width\":846,\"height\":451,\"caption\":\"The Chapelcross nuclear power station in Scotland, decommissioned in 2004. (Photo: James T M Towill)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Climate Home News\",\"description\":\"Climate change news, analysis, commentary, video and podcasts focused on developments in global climate politics\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Climate Home News\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png\",\"width\":2856,\"height\":862,\"caption\":\"Climate Home News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/ClimateHome\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/climate-home-news\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/climatestudio\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/47edcea2d5aa3742b830178f67913940\",\"name\":\"Sara Stefanini\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/x.com\/sarastefaninii\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/author\/sara-stefanini\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout","description":"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout","og_description":"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply","og_url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/","og_site_name":"Climate Home News","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":846,"height":451,"url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sara Stefanini","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@sarastefaninii","twitter_site":"@ClimateHome","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sara Stefanini","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/"},"author":{"name":"Sara Stefanini","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/47edcea2d5aa3742b830178f67913940"},"headline":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout","datePublished":"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/"},"wordCount":1157,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg","articleSection":["Brexit","Energy","EU","Nuclear"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/","name":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T10:50:10+00:00","description":"UK government report card on replacing the EU's atomic energy community shows progress, but no deal on March 29 still threatens power and medical supply","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2018\/10\/geograph-3848531-by-James-T-M-Towill.jpg","width":846,"height":451,"caption":"The Chapelcross nuclear power station in Scotland, decommissioned in 2004. (Photo: James T M Towill)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/2018\/10\/12\/brexit-avoiding-nuclear-fallout\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Brexit: Avoiding the nuclear fallout"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/","name":"Climate Home News","description":"Climate change news, analysis, commentary, video and podcasts focused on developments in global climate politics","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#organization","name":"Climate Home News","url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cdn.climatechangenews.com\/files\/2024\/01\/03155729\/Climate-Home-News-Logo-RGB-Colour.png","width":2856,"height":862,"caption":"Climate Home News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ClimateHomeNews\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ClimateHome","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/climate-home-news","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/climatestudio"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/47edcea2d5aa3742b830178f67913940","name":"Sara Stefanini","sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/sarastefaninii"],"url":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/author\/sara-stefanini\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37799"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37799"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37804,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37799\/revisions\/37804"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37799"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.climatechangenews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=37799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}